“Segmentation was wrong when it was forced by white people, and I believe it is still wrong when it is requested by black people.”
Coretta Scott King
The text for my post today comes from a petition to repeal the Coretta Scott King Book Wards Round Table (CSKBART)’s vote to change its definition of African American. This definition will change the eligibility for the CSK Book Awards. The only thing I can add to what is so well stated here is that in addition to voting NO for this resolution, should it stand, I will discontinue my member is the CSKBART and you will not see me at The Breakfast next year. Considering the attitude this reveals, I don’t know that I’ll be there either way.
Full text can be found here: https://forms.gle/oKSD29BTZQv9RYxr5
Note that you must be a CSKBART member to vote on this issue, though I doubt they can ignore a large public outcry. To be clear, I do not support this change. I laugh at the irony of those who talk about The Motherland and drape themselves in kente cloth and cowrie shells while at the same time separating themselves from our Black brother and sisters who more recently left the continent most often for reasons that continue to be related to white imperialism.
So, here’s what my fuss is about:
“I, LaKeshia Darden, Chair of the 2024 Coretta Scott King Book Awards, am submitting this appeal on behalf of the 2023-2024 CSK Jury in response to the previous Chair, Dr. Brenda Annisette-Pruitt, and the CSKBART Executive Board’s decision to redefine CSKBART’s definition of African American when determining an author’s and illustrator’s eligibility for the CSK Book Award.
The current definition in the CSK Jury Manual is the following:
2. “Must be written/illustrated by an African American. Generally speaking, ‘African American’ refers to a person of color of African heritage who is a citizen or permanent resident of the United States,” p. 5.
The CSKBART Executive Board proposed and approved the following change to the definition of African American:
African Americans are descendants of enslaved Africans born in the United States.
African American is an ethnic group.
Black American is an ethnic group consisting of Americans with partial, or total ancestry from Black racial groups in Africa.
The updated definition was shared with CSKBART members during the general membership meeting at ALA Annual on June 24, 2023. Many members present expressed their disdain for the new definition because it is divisive and xenophobic. Current and past jury members were concerned about how CSKBART would determine if authors and illustrators were “descendants of enslaved Africans born in the United States,” and that this updated definition would have dire consequences on authors’ and illustrators’ eligibility. The CSK Jury Chair is responsible for checking the citizenship of each submission. Adding this new criterion is not feasible and attempting to enforce it would open CSKBART to scrutiny.
Ramifications:
Legal: According to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), discrimination is illegal–when a person or a company intentionally treats you differently based on your race, ethnicity, or national origin. Why am I including this? We have awarded Black authors and illustrators in the past based on the criterion that they were American citizens with African ancestry. To make such a drastic change would result in exclusion rather than inclusion.
Integrity of the Award: The CSKBART Executive Board failed to reach out to The King Center to get their position on changing the definition. However, as Chair of the CSK Jury, I reached out to The King Center and requested an official statement on their position on changing the definition of African American for the CSK Award, named in honor of Mrs. Coretta Scott King. My concerns have been forwarded to Dr. Bernice King, CEO of The King Center and head of the King Family Estate. I anticipate an official response in the coming weeks.
I understand that the CSKBART Executive Board is confident that they appropriately interpreted the intended definition of the CSKBART’s founders. However, how can the CSKBART Executive Board be so sure that they have interpreted the founders’ intent correctly, especially in the face of so much opposition from the members of CSKBART? I sought to review the bylaws when drafting this motion and found the following message posted on the website:
“The CSKBART Executive Board and Standing Committee Chairs are currently working to update the Leadership and Governance Documents, including the CSKBART Constitution and Bylaws. The newly updated document will be available for viewing beginning on April 7, 2023, at 5:00 PM (EST).” The updated bylaws have yet to be posted nor is there access to the originals.
I am concerned that the original bylaws are no longer accessible on the website. After finding a copy of CSKBART’s Bylaws and Constitution (linked below), it is clear that a proposal to change the definition of African American must be brought to CSKBART membership.”
SOURCE: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSeA-8zVwAdmY_IzOesRDrnmWqS4444ZFcmNATD-sRitd3SHpQ/viewform

Whoa!
<
div dir=”ltr”>
<
blockquote type=”cite”>
LikeLike
Wait – is this to say that a descendant of a person who chose to come from Africa to America in 1910 is not African American?! I’m mystified by the rationale here. Why is the designation limited to descendants of slaves? That ancestry gets harder to track with every generation. Would CSK have agreed with this? I have so many questions.
LikeLike
Cathy, I’m looking for a good article to explain. I think your question really highlights that in its decision, the CSK exec committee is denying the opportunity for young readers to explore the complexities of Black American culture.
This may help you https://www.sbstatesman.com/2021/01/21/black-or-african-american-black-americans-discuss-the-difference/
LikeLike
I first heard about this situation yesterday while I was in the ER waiting room (my sis had to go in, she’s home now) and it just broke my heart. So getting this later in the day was a boost–thanks for this post, Edi.
xox
LikeLike
What’s the purpose of the CSK award? Was it not to elevate Black talent because it was being ignored by white gatekeepers? What does it matter if ones ancestors were enslaved in the US or the Caribbean? That’s just a stop on the boat. And what if they were never enslaved but had to deal with oppression and destabilization from colonialism? As far as I know, all Black people face the same racism in publishing regardless of whether our ancestors were enslaved in the US or not.
I’m disappointed this even came up.
Thanks for addressing it, Edi.
LikeLike
And, someone is going to have to do a lot of searching on Ancestry! We were a lot more mobile that people want to admit. I can think of people who have multiple citizenships, including US, with ancestors who were enslaved in the US. I can think of people whose family has been in the US for generations but, finding that ancestor who was enslaved can be more than a notion. I know; I’ve searched my own history. Finding that person doesn’t document the generational oppression in my family. What if your family has been here since the 17th or 18th century but was never enslaved?
Talking to Blacks who migrate here from other countries, they will tell you that they didn’t know they were Black until they got here. The sickness of US racism stains everyone in this country, no matter where they come from or when they land here.
LikeLike
I wonder where this came from?!
With so much recent gatekeeping and division with reference to African Americans and books celebrating the same, it just doesn’t make sense. Do we not have enough people and institutions who seek to limit and define our identities?!
Thank you, Edi, for giving this issue a wider audience.
LikeLike